A peer-reviewed journal that offers evidence-based clinical information and continuing education for dentists.

Clinical Use of Silver Diamine Fluoride

Providing options for a diverse array of patients, this agent’s ease of use has the potential to break down barriers to care for individuals with special needs.

Providing options for a diverse array of patients, this agent’s ease of use has the potential to break down barriers to care for individuals with special needs

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been used internationally for years for treating dentinal hypersensitivity and caries lesions.1–3 In 2014, it was cleared for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating sensitivity, and was granted the FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation for the arrest of dental caries in 2016.4,5 This is a cost effective, minimally invasive, and clinically simple treatment option for all patients. Moreover, SDF has the potential to expand access to care for vulnerable populations, such as adults with special health care needs.1 This article will provide an overview of its use in clinical practice.

In its 38% formulation, SDF is composed of 25% silver ions (Ag+1) and 5% fluoride ions (F-1) dissolved in 8% amine (2NH3).1,2 Similar in structure to silver nitrate, plus fluoride,1 SDF’s biochemical interaction with tooth structure and cariogenic bacteria is also similar (Figure 1).1,2 Oral health professionals are aware of the major interaction of fluoride with tooth structure to form fluorapatite, but may be less aware of the antimicrobial role of silver.1,2,6–11 Silver reacts with thiol groups in the amino acids and nucleic acids to prevent the formation of disulfide bonds. These bonds are essential in forming and maintaining proper structure and function of proteins and nucleic acids. Improper structure and function of these molecules leads to bacterial cell death.1,2,6,7,8–10

FIGURE 1. In the oral environment, silver diamine fluoride behaves similarly to silver nitrate, plus fluoride. Note that both help strengthen the crystalline structure of the tooth by forming fluorapatite, and both use silver to interact with the thiol groups, causing damage to the deoxyribonucleic acid and proteins in bacteria.

One consideration when deciding if SDF is appropriate is the agent’s unesthetic properties, as it will permanently stain caries lesions black (Figures 2A through 2E, page 35). Treatment can be made more esthetic with traditional therapies or use of the silver modified atraumatic restorative technique at a later appointment.3 When assessing risks versus benefits, quality of life and the patient’s priority on physical appearance must be taken into account. It is also important to consider that acceptance of unesthetic staining may be greater than expected.

In a 2017 study of 98 mothers and 22 fathers, the parents were educated about the option of SDF treatment for their children, and were next asked about acceptance and preferences. In posterior cases, 67.5% of parents felt the staining was tolerable, and 53.6% answered that SDF treatment would be preferred over traditional treatment. For anterior applications, the percentages were 29.7% and 26.9%, respectively. When given the choice between SDF and treatment under general anesthesia, the percentages of parents who preferred SDF treatment was reported as 68% for posterior cases, and 60.3% for anterior dentition.12

For noncooperative, medically compromised patients, SDF may be a safe and minimally invasive treatment option. Other patients who may realize major benefits from SDF include patients on a wait list for operating room treatment, patients who are noncompliant with oral hygiene, individuals with rampant or difficult-to-restore caries, patients with failing prosthodontic work, patients who refuse extraction of nonrestorable teeth, and patients whose temporary condition restricts them from traditional treatment. That noted, a patient does not have to fall into one of these categories to benefit from SDF therapy; this is a viable option for any patient who desires minimally invasive dentistry.

Information about pregnancy considerations for SDF therapy is not readily available at this time. This agent should not be used on patients with a silver allergy,1 and its use should be avoided in patients with open lesions, stomatitis or ulcerative gingivitis. The staining of epithelium will eventually resolve with epithelial turnover. If it is subepithelial, however — as is possible in an open lesion — the staining can be permanent.1

Given its propensity to stain lesions black, one of the most important steps prior to the use of SDF is to obtain informed, written consent from the patient and/or parent/caregiver.

FIGURES 2A through 2E. Photo before application of silver diamine fluoride (A), and one week post application (B). Note the black staining at the gingiva around the recurrent caries in this image taken a month after application (C). This image of a different patient was taken after a second application of silver diamine fluoride (D). This was a nonrestorable tooth that the patient refused to have extracted; the image shows silver diamine fluoride on the lesion (E).


The technique used for SDF delivery can be modified to meet the clinical needs of individual patients. A suggested SDF protocol for patients with behavioral challenges is to dry, apply and protect.

  • Obtain informed consent
  • Achieve the best isolation possible
  • Dry the tooth with air and gauze
  • Although not necessary, some operators prefer to remove caries with a spoon excavator
  • Apply SDF with a microbrush
  • Do not rinse
  • Protect the site by brushing fluoride varnish or petroleum jelly over SDF-treated surfaces

The use of varnish will not “seal in” the SDF;1 in this protocol, varnish is used to create a short-term barrier between the treated surface and saliva. While there is little to no evidence to support partially removing the caries lesion,1,11 it is included in this protocol as there is no evidence to suggest partial caries removal causes harm. In addition, it may be easier for providers to monitor arrest with partial caries removal.

Clinicians are advised to check in one to three weeks post-application to see if caries have been arrested. If the lesion is not arrested, SDF should be reapplied.13 If arrested, however, the agent should be reapplied every three to six months, or until operative treatment can be performed.1 Although SDF has demonstrated its efficacy if applied every six months,14 as with all treatments, success is not guaranteed and regular follow-up is recommended. The recare schedule should be determined based on individual risks and results.

FIGURES 3A through 3C. This tooth was extracted due to an endodontic/periodontic lesion and a hopeless periodontal prognosis (A). The tooth had a deep furcation caries lesion and, after extraction, dentin was removed to see how deep the silver diamine fluoride penetrated into the lesion (B). Penetration of the agent was evident throughout the lesion and into the pulp (C).


There are numerous studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of SDF, and the list extends beyond what is mentioned in this article.1–3,6,7,10,11,14–18 Silver and fluoride ions can penetrate approximately 25 microns into enamel, and 50 to 200 microns into dentin.1 In fact, SDF has arrested lesions 150 microns deep.1 Caries lesions are more effectively arrested with multiple applications.1,15

Due to the availability of a popular Japanese SDF product, many studies were conducted in the late 1960s and early 1970s — but these papers have a high risk of bias, as they were provided by the manufacturer. Several are included in this article because their age and origin offer interesting insight. The following is a summary of this research. A split-mouth study of 10 patients (using 30 SDF-treated teeth, and 10 control teeth) found 61% of caries arrested in three months, 69% at six months, 87% at 12 months, 88% at 24 months, and 97% at 30 months.16 When examining incidence of reduced sensitivity, one study stated that 64% of patients said SDF provided relief, 31% reported it as being fairly effective, and 5% said it was ineffective.17 A split-mouth study was done to determine how SDF placement prior to alloy placement affected the rate of recurrent caries. The researchers found a recurrence rate of 31% after two years in the control side, and 0% in the SDF-treated side.18

More recent studies have also demonstrated effectiveness. A study on 375 preschoolers divided the children into five groups. Groups 1 and 2 received SDF annually, and groups 3 and 4 received 5% sodium fluoride varnish every three months. Groups 1 and 3 had soft caries removed, while groups 2 and 4 did not. Looking at the arrest of caries lesions, the results demonstrated that annual application of SDF was more effective than application of 5% sodium fluoride every three months. This research also demonstrated that it was not necessary to remove soft caries.11

A 2017 study of 32 children examined 118 active caries lesions. Researchers applied SDF to the lesions, and the subjects returned for follow-up at three weeks, and again at three months. Of the 102 lesions the team was able to follow the entirety of the study, 100 were arrested after the first application, and the remaining two were arrested after the second appli­cation.13

Another study of 373 subjects ages 6 to 15 demonstrated that application of SDF every six months was 77% effective in arresting active caries on canines and permanent first molars.14

Yet another group looked at the effectiveness of SDF in arresting active root surface caries in a geriatric population. Eighty-three elders were divided into three groups: Annual application of soda water (control), annual application of SDF, and annual application of SDF, plus potassium iodide. The team re­viewed 100 lesions over 30 months and found that 45% of the lesions were arrested in the control group. By comparison, 90% of the lesions in the SDF group were arrested, and in the SDF, plus potassium iodide group, 93% of the lesions were arrested.19


FIGURE 4. Silver diamine fluoride will stain operatory surfaces, but cleaning products, such as Mr. Clean Magic Eraser cleaners, have shown success in removing stains from clinical surfaces.

In large quantities, silver can be nephro/hepatotoxic and can cause intestinal irritation and graying of the sclera.7 It can also cross the blood-testis barrier. Only minimal amounts of silver are used in dental treatment with SDF; thus, clinicians who adhere to recommended maximum dosages should be able to avoid these problems.1 More realistic adverse effects include taste-induced nausea, pulpal irritation, and the aforementioned staining. Another consideration is that because SDF penetrates deep into dentin, if the caries extends to the pulp, the agent can, as well (Figures 3A through 3C, page 35). This agent can also act as a pulpal irritant.1

As noted, staining is the major adverse effect — and SDF can stain more than just teeth. It can also stain soft tissues, restoration margins, fingernails, skin, clothing and operatory surfaces (Figure 4). The stain will dissipate when the epithelium turns over; that means about 14 days in the oral mucosa, a little longer on skin, much longer on nails, and permanent staining on the tooth, countertops and clothing. The extent of staining and the length of staining vary significantly among individuals.

One clinical protocol recommends rinsing if the procedure calls for bonding to a direct restoration.1 Some studies suggest that SDF does not affect the bonding of glass ionomers and composites.20,21 In countries where SDF with potassium iodide is used, clinicians are advised to rinse off the precipitate prior to bonding.21


Despite widespread global use for years, there is much to learn about SDF. The intention of this article was to provide basic information about its clinical application. Through its ease of application and cost effectiveness, SDF has the potential to improve the oral heath of many underserved patient populations. This agent is not a miracle drug and does not work all of the time, nothing does. However, it is a minimally invasive option for all patients — and, for some, perhaps the best and only option.


  • Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been used internationally for years in treating dentinal hypersensitivity and dental caries.1–3
  • Initially cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating dentinal hypersensitivity, SDF was granted the FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation for the arrest of dental caries in 2016.
  • This cost-effective and easy-to-apply agent has the potential to expand access to care for vulnerable populations, including adults with special health care needs.1
  • At the same time, this is a viable therapy for any patient or parent/caregiver who desires minimally invasive dentistry for themselves or their child.
  • One consideration when deciding if SDF is appropriate is the agent’s unesthetic properties, as it will permanently stain caries lesions black.
  • The technique used for SDF delivery can be modified to meet individual patients’ clinical needs.
  • Although SDF has demonstrated its efficacy if applied every six months,14 as with all treatments, success is not guaranteed and regular follow-up is recommended.


  1. Horst JA, Ellenikiotis H, UCSF Silver Caries Arrest Committee, Milgrom PM. UCSF protocol for caries arrest using silver diamine fluoride: rationale, indications, and consent. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2016;44:16–28.
  2. Rosenblatt A, Stamford TC, Niederman R. Silver diamine fluoride: a caries ”silver-fluoride bullet.’’ J Dent Res. 2009;88:116–125.
  3. MacLean J. Top 5 misconsceptions of silver diamine fluoride. Dental Town. 2017;89–93.
  4. Elevate Oral Care. Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Silver Diamine Fluoride granted by FDA. Available at: advantagedental.com/Media/zgefi04s.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2018.
  5. Decisions in Dentistry. Silver Diamine Fluoride Receives New FDA Designation. Available at: decisionsindentistry.com/article/silver-diamine-fluoride-receives-new-fda-designation/print/ posted. Accessed January 12, 2018.
  6. Alvear BA, Horst JA, Hirsch JP, Duffin S, Wong A, Young DA. Arresting caries. Dimensions of Dental Hygiene. 2016;14(7):61–64.
  7. Prabhu S, Poulose EK. Silver nanoparicles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int Nano Lett. 2012;2:32.
  8. Hernandez-Sierra JA, Ruiz F, Pena DC, et al. The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans to nanoparticles of silver, zinc oxide and gold. Nanomedicine. 2008;4:237–240.
  9. Liau SY, Read DC, Pugh WJ, Furr JR, Russell AD. Interaction of silver nitrate with readily identifiable groups: relationship to antibacterial action of silver ions. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997;25:279–283.
  10. Mei ML, Chu CH, Low KH, Che CM, LO EC. Caries arresting effect of silver diamine fluoride on dentine carious lesion with S. Mutans and L acidophilus duel species cariogenic biofilm. Med Oral Pato Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e824–31.
  11. Chu CH, Lo EC, Lin HC. Effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish in arresting dentin caries in Chinese preschool children. J Dent Res. 2002;81:767–770.
  12. Crystal YO, Janal MN, Hamilton DS, Niederman R. Parental perceptions and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride staining. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017:148:510–518.
  13. Clemens J, Gold J, Chaffin J. Effect and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride treatment on dental caries in primary teeth. J Public Health Dent. July 27, 2017. Epub ahead of print.
  14. Llorda JC, Rodriguez A, Ferrer B, Menardia V, Ramos T, Morato M. Efficacy of silver diamine fluoride for caries reduction in primary teeth and first permanent molars of schoolchildren: 36-month clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2005;84:721–724.
  15. Yee R, Holmgren C, Mulder J. Lama D. Walker D van Palenstein Helderman W. Efficacy of silver diamine fluoride for arresting caries treatment. J Dent Res. 2009;88:644–647.
  16. Nishino M. Studies on the topical application of ammoniacal silver fluoride for the arrest of dental caries. Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi. 1969;12:1–14.
  17. Aono M, Munemoto K, Okada H, et al. Effect of ammonical silver fluoride on cervical hypersensitivity. Jap J Conserv Dent. 1967;10:31–36.
  18. Shimizu A. Effect of diamine silver fluoride on recurrent caries. Jap J Conserv Dent. 1974;17:183–201.
  19. Li R, Lo EC, Liu BY, Wong MC, Chu CH. Randomized clinical trial on arresting dental root caries through silver dimaine fluoride applications in community dwelling elders. J Dent. 2016;51:15–20.
  20. Quock RL, Barros JA, Yang SW, Patel SA. Effect of silver diamine fluoride on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent. 2012;37:610–616.
  21. Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Mulyani. The effect of silver fluoride and potassium iodide on the bond strength of auto cure glass ionomer cement to dentine. Aust Dent J. 2006;51:42–45.


The author has no commercial conflicts of interest to disclose.

From Decisions in Dentistry. February 2018;4(2):30-32,35-36.


1 Comment
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy